Intelligence as a Powerful Catalyst of Job Performance: Evidence from Highly Educated Workers:

Resumen

Esta investigación puso a prueba la hipótesis de que la inteligencia psicométrica, medida mediante pruebas de CI, es relevante para el desempeño laboral en Brasil, particularmente en ocupaciones más calificadas. Para ello, se realizó un estudio hipotético-deductivo y transversal con 134 trabajadores brasileños adultos con título de educación superior, utilizando medidas breves de CI, personalidad y rasgos de liderazgo, así como un cuestionario sociodemográfico y de vida laboral. Los análisis estadísticos mediante la Prueba Canónica, la Correlación de Spearman y la Regresión Logit indicaron que la inteligencia se correlacionó con el desempeño laboral autoevaluado (rho = 0,17) y que los individuos con puntuaciones de 111+ presentaron una probabilidad sustancialmente mayor de reportar un desempeño superior en los cargos más calificados (71,7 % vs. 41,7 %). En este nivel más alto de inteligencia, la duración del empleo también mostró asociaciones más fuertes con el puesto ocupado (rho = 0,40 vs. 0,08) y con los ingresos (rho = 0,53 vs. 0,40). Tras controlar la personalidad, la carga de trabajo y la calidad de vida laboral, el CI se mantuvo como el predictor independiente más fuerte del desempeño superior (OR = 8,774). En conjunto, los hallazgos sugieren que, entre los trabajadores con educación superior, la inteligencia constituye un componente altamente significativo e independiente del desempeño laboral y del éxito ocupacional. 

Palabras clave

CI

inteligencia

desempeño laboral

vida laboral

gestión de personas

trabajo digno

Citas

Aketch, J. R., Odera, O., Chepkuto, P., & Okaka, O. (2012). Effects of quality of work life on job performance: Theoretical perspectives and literature review. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(5), 383–388.

Al-Malki, M., & Juan, W. (2018). Leadership styles and job performance: A literature review. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 3(3), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.33.3004

Alves, I. C. B., Rosa, H. R., Silva, M. A., & Sardinha, L. S. (2016). Avaliação da inteligência: revisão de literatura de 2005 a 2014. Avaliação Psicológica, 15(spe), 89–97. https://pepsic.scielo.org/pdf/avp/v15nspe/v15nspea10.pdf

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Baumgartl, V. O., & Nascimento, E. (2004). A Bateria de Provas de Raciocínio (BPR-5) aplicada a um contexto organizacional. Psico-USF, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712004000100002

Baumgartl, V. O., & Primi, R. (2006). Evidências de validade da bateria de provas de raciocínio (BPR-5) para seleção de pessoal. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 19(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722006000200010

Bertua, C., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2022). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26994

Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1447-6

Byington, E., & Felps, W. (2010). Why do IQ scores predict job performance? An alternative, sociological explanation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.003

Campos, C. R., & Nakano, T. C. (2012). Produção científica sobre avaliação da inteligência: o estado da arte. Interação Psicológica, 16(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v16i2.22619

Cobêro, C., Primi, R., & Muniz, M. (2006). Inteligência emocional e desempenho no trabalho: um estudo com o MSCEIT, BPR-5 e 16PF. Paidéia, 16(35), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2006000300005

Conselho Nacional de Saúde. (2016). Resolução nº 510, de 7 de abril de 2016. Ministério da Saúde. Diário Oficial da União, nº 98, Seção 1, 44–46.

Cronshaw, S. F., Hamilton, L. K., Onyura, B. R., & Winston, A. S. (2006). Case for non-biased intelligence testing against black Africans has not been made: A comment on Rushton, Skuy, and Bons (2004). International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00346.x

Efraty, D., & Sirgy, M. J. (1990). The effects of quality of working life (QWL) on employee behavioral responses. Social Indicators Research, 22, 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286389

Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Intelligence: A new look. Transaction Publishers. Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2011). Adult careers: Does childhood IQ predict later life outcome? Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00281.x

Frieder, R. E., Wang, G., & Oh, I.-S. (2018). Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000274

Ganuthula, V., & Sinha, S. (2019). The looking glass for intelligence quotient tests: The interplay of motivation, cognitive functioning, and affect. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2857. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02857

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr., W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. W. W. Norton & Company.

Hambrick, D. Z., Burgoyne, A. P., & Oswald, F. L. (2024). The validity of general cognitive ability predicting job-specific performance is stable across different levels of job experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001150

Haryono, S., Supardi, S., & Udin, U. (2020). The effect of training and job promotion on work motivation and its implications on job performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 10(9), 2107–2112. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.1.019

Hermstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. Free Press.

Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100

Homack, S. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (2007). Essentials of Assessment with Brief Intelligence Tests. Wiley.

Hunt, E. (2011). Human intelligence. Cambridge University Press. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869

Jensen, A. R. (1982). The debunking of scientific fossils and straw persons. Contemporary Education Review, 1(2), 121–135.

Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x

Kaufman, A. S. (2009). IQ testing 101. Springer Publishing.

Kaufman, J. C., & Kaufman, A. S. (2001). Time for the changing of the guard: A farewell to short forms of intelligence tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290101900305

Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2012). Intelligence: A unifying construct for the social sciences. Ulster Institute for Social Research.

Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). IQ and human intelligence (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Bányai, T., Nurunnabi, M., & Subhan, Q. A. (2019). An examination of sustainable HRM practices on job performance: An application of training as a moderator. Sustainability, 11(8), 2263. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082263

Meisenberg, G. (2012). National IQ and economic outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(2), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.022

Mihalcea, A. (2014). Leadership, personality, job satisfaction and job performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.287

Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77

Noronha, A. P. P., Freitas, F. A., & Ottati, F. (2002). Parâmetros psicométricos de testes de inteligência. Interação. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722003000100012

Noronha, A. P. P., Primi, R., & Alchieri, J. C. (2004). Parâmetros psicométricos: uma análise de testes psicológicos comercializados no Brasil. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 24(4), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932004000400011

Noronha, A. P. P., Vendramini, C. M. D., Canguçu, C., Souza, C. V. R., Cobêro, C., Paula, L. M., Franco, M. O., Lima, O. M. P., Guerra, P. B. C., & Filizatti, R. (2003). Propriedades psicométricas apresentadas em manuais de testes de inteligência. Psicologia em Estudo, 8(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722003000100012

Park, S., Kang, H.-S., & Kim, E.-J. (2018). The role of supervisor support on employees’ training and job performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(1/2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2017-0054

Paula, S. L., & Souza, B. C. (2019). Recurso informacional de jogadores de videogame. Brazilian Journal of Information Science, 13(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.04.p21

Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3

Pierson, E. E., Kilmer, L. M., Rothlisberg, B. A., & McIntosh, D. E. (2012). Use of brief intelligence tests in the identification of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428193

Primi, R. (2010). Avaliação psicológica no Brasil: fundamentos, situação atual e direções para o futuro. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 26, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722010000500003

Reppold, C. T., Serafini, A. J., Gurgel, L. G., & Kaiser, V. (2017). Avaliação de aspectos cognitivos em adultos: análise de manuais de instrumentos aprovados. Avaliação Psicológica, 16(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2017.1602.03

Richardson, K., & Norgate, S. H. (2015). Does IQ really predict job performance? Applied Developmental Science, 19(3), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2014.983635

Righetto, G., Steinmeier, M., & Andrade, R. (2012). Testes de inteligência mantêm popularidade, apesar das controvérsias. ComCiência, 144.

Rubel, M. R. B., & Kee, D. M. H. (2014). Quality of work life and employee performance: Antecedent and outcome of job satisfaction in partial least square (PLS). World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(4), 456–467.

Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30

Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2019). Meta-analysis of the validity of general mental ability for five performance criteria: Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited. Front Psychology, 10, 2227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02227

Schönemann, P. H. (1997). On models and muddles of heritability. Genetica, 99(2-3), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018358504373

Scullin, M. K., Peters, E., Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2000). The role of IQ and education in predicting later labor market outcomes: Implications for affirmative action. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.63

Silva, J. A., Ribeiro-Filho, N. P., & Santos, R. C. (2012). Inteligência humana e suas implicações. Temas em Psicologia, 20(1), 155–187.

Souza, B. C., & Rangel, J. F. L. B. Jr. (2015). Speed of processing and creativity in the digital age. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 1(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.18536/bcce.2015.07.1.1.03

S

ouza, B. C., & Roazzi, A. (2017). What is your faction? Multidimensional evidence for the divergent series as the basis for a new model of personality and work life. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01751

Souza, B. C., & Roazzi, A. (2020). Desigualdade de renda entre homens e mulheres: uma visão mais ampla incluindo escolhas, satisfação e percepção de capacidade. Revista EDUCAmazônia - Educação, Sociedade e Meio Ambiente, 24(1), 287–313.

Souza, B. C., De Lima e Silva, L. X., & Roazzi, A. (2010). MMORPGS and cognitive performance: A study with 1280 Brazilian high school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1564–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.001

Souza, B. C., Roazzi, A., & Neto, A. S. A. (2023). How to easily construct a very brief practical measure of IQ: The Pernambuco Adult Intelligence Mini Test. Revista AMAzônica, 16(2), 345–378.

Souza, B. C., Roazzi, A., Rodrigues, J., & Paula, S. L. (2019). Commercial videogames and their potential for higher education: A study with 347 Brazilian undergraduate business management students. Acta Scientiae, 21(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v21iss1id4936

Souza, B. C., Souza, F. M. C., Roazzi, A., & Lula, A. M. (2015). The lack of a treatment of uncertainty in facet theory: A relevant problem? In A. Roazzi, B. C. de Souza, & W. Bilsky (Eds.), Facet theory: Searching for structure in complex social, cultural and psychological phenomena (pp. 54–64). Editora UFPE. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2129.7682

Souza, B. C., Silva, A. S., Silva, A. M., Roazzi, A., & Carrilho, S. L. S. (2012). Putting the Cognitive Mediation Networks Theory to the test: Evaluation of a framework for understanding the digital age. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2320–2330.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.002

Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1993). The g-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770441

Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Bundy, D. (2001). The predictive value of IQ. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0005

Taissun, A. S., Souza, M. G. T. C., Silva, E. S., & Souza, B. C. (2012). Explorando os elementos psicossociais da criminologia do homicídio no Nordeste: um estudo empírico. Rios Eletrônica (FASETE), 6, 105–119. https://www.unirios.edu.br/revistarios/media/revistas/2012/6/explorando_os_elementos_psicossociais_ da_criminologia_do_homicidio_no_nordeste.pdf

Thakur, R., & Sharma, D. (2019). A study of impact of quality of work life on work performance. Management and Labour Studies, 44(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X19851912

Vendramini, C. M. M., & Lopes, F. L. (2008). Leitura de manuais de testes psicológicos por estudantes e profissionais de psicologia. Avaliação Psicológica, 7(1), 93–105. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712008000100012

Wechsler, S. M., Hutz, C. S., & Primi, R. (2019). O desenvolvimento da avaliação psicológica no Brasil: Avanços históricos e desafios. Avaliação Psicológica, 18(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2019.1802.15466.02

Citaciones

Citas en Crossref

Citas en Scopus

Citas en Google Sholar

Citas en Europe PMC