Estructura interna de la versión abreviada del Inventario de Respuestas de Afrontamiento

Resumen

El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar la estructura interna de la versión abreviada del Inventario de Respuestas de Afrontamiento (CRI-A) con una muestra de 987 individuos con edades entre los 18 y 63 años (M = 29; DE = 9.86) de la ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se compararon tres modelos mediante análisis factoriales confirmatorios: el Modelo 1, con el ajuste de los 24 reactivos de la versión abreviada del CRI-A a los factores de aproximación y evitación; el Modelo 2, con el ajuste de los 24 reactivos a cuatro dimensiones según foco y método; y el Modelo 3, con el ajuste de los 24 reactivos a ocho dimensiones con factores de segundo orden de aproximación y de evitación. Los modelos 1 y 2 reespecificados mostraron ajustes adecuados, con valores de χ² (GL) = 650.18 (146), RMSEA (IC 90 %) = .07 (.07-.08), SRMR = .08, CFI = .92, TLI = .91, GFI = .96, PNFI = .73, AIC = 46629.55, y χ² (GL) = 747.55 (146), RMSEA (IC 90 %) = .06 (.06-.07), SRMR = .07, CFI = .93, TLI = .92, GFI = .97, PNFI = .79, AIC = 51908.43, respectivamente, e invarianza según el género. El Modelo 1 mostró valores de confiabilidad más elevados. A partir de los resultados y del modelo teórico de base, se arribó a una versión abreviada del CRI-A válida y fiable, con 19 reactivos que miden cuatro factores.

Palabras clave

afrontamiento

validez

estructura factorial

invarianza

confiabilidad

Citas

Allen, M. T. (2021). Explorations of avoidance and approach coping and perceived stress with a computer-based avatar task: detrimental effects of resignation and withdrawal. PeerJ, 9, e11265. https://doi.org/10.7717/ peerj.11265

American Psychological Association [APA]. (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6.a ed.). American Psychological Association.

Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1997). A stitch in time: self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.417

Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2018). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. En G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 98-122). Routledge.

Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Drummond, S. (2017). Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. En C. L. Cooper & J. C. Quick (Eds.), The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice (pp. 351-364). Wiley Blackwell. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/9781118993811.ch21

Blalock, J. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2000). Interaction of cognitive avoidance coping and stress in predicting depression/ anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005450908245

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Multigroup comparisons: Testing for measurement, structural, and latent mean equivalence. En F. T. L. Leong, D. Bartram, F. M. Cheung, K. F. Geisinger & D. Iliescu (Eds.), The ITC International Handbook of Testing and Assessment (pp. 377-394). Oxford University Press.

Chalmers, R. P. (2018). On Misconceptions and the Limited Usefulness of Ordinal Alpha. Educational and psychological measurement, 78(6), 1056-1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417727036

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2.a ed.). Routledge.

Crespo, M., & Labrador, F. (2003). Estrés. Síntesis. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https:// doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Billiet, J., & Meuleman, B. (Eds.). (2018). Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (2.a ed.). Routledge.

Eyles, D. J., & Bates, G. W. (2005). Development of a shortened form of the Coping Responses Inventory-Youth with an Australian sample. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 161-170. https://figshare.swinburne. edu.au/ndownloader/files/47534270

Flora, D. B. (2020). Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951747

Folkman, S. (2020). Stress: Appraisal and Coping. En M. D. Gellman & J. R. Turner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 1913-1915). Springer.

Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 745-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456

Frydenberg, E. (2017). Coping and the Challenge of Resilience. Springer.

Fu, W., Wang, C., Zou, L., Guo, Y., Lu, Z., Yan, S., & Mao, J. (2020). Psychological health, sleep quality, and coping styles to stress facing the COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Translational Psychiatry, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41398-020-00913-3

Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating Ordinal Reliability for Likert-Type and Ordinal Item Response Data: A Conceptual, Empirical, and Practical Guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17, 3. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ977577.pdf

Gallucci, M., & Jentschke, S. (2021). SEMLj: jamovi SEM Analysis. [jamovi module]. https://semlj.github.io

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2011). Descriptive statistics. En S. Hartman (Ed.), SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 18.0 Update (pp. 95-104). Pearson.

Gomis-Pomares, A., Villanueva, L., & Basto-Pereira, M. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Deviant Behavior Variety Scale in Young Spanish Adults. Psicothema, 34(2), 308-315. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/4750.pdf

Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2009). Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9099-3

Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of Psychological Assessment (5.a ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Gurvich, C., Thomas, N., Thomas, E. H., Hudaib, A. R., Sood, L., Fabiatos, K., Sutton, K., Isaacs, A., Arunogiri, S., Sharp, G., & Kulkarni, J. (2020). Coping styles and mental health in response to societal changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(5), 540-549. https://doi. org/10.1177/0020764020961790

Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7.a ed.). Pearson New International Edition.

Halstead, M., Johnson, S. B., & Cunningham, W. (1993). Measuring coping in adolescents: An application of the Ways of Coping Checklist. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22(3), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15374424jccp2203_4

Herman-Stahl, M. A., Stemmler, M., & Petersen, A. C. (1995). Approach and avoidant coping: Implications for adolescent mental health. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24(6), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536949

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. En R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 1-15). Sage Publications, Inc.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y., Miller, P., Quick, C., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Selig, J., Boulton, A., Preacher, K., Coffman, D., Rhemtulla, M., Robitzsch, A., Enders, C., Arslan, R., Clinton, B., Panko, P., Merkle, E., Chesnut, S., … Rönkkö, M. (2019). semTools: Useful Tools for Structural Equation Modeling. [R Package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools

Kar, N., Kar, B., & Kar, S. (2021). Stress and coping during COVID-19 pandemic: Result of an online survey. Psychiatry Research, 295, 113598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113598

Kemper, C. J., Trapp, S., Kathmann, N., Samuel, D. B., & Ziegler, M. (2019). Short versus long scales in clinical assessment: Exploring the trade-off between resources saved and psychometric quality lost using two measures of obsessive–compulsive symptoms. Assessment, 26(5), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118810057

Kirchner, T., Forns, M., Muñoz, D., & Pereda, N. (2008). Psychometric properties and dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the Coping Responses Inventory-Adult Form. Psicothema, 20(4), 902-909. https://www. psicothema.com/pdf/3573.pdf

Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (efa, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 9(8), 2207-2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126

Labiano, L. M., & Correché, M. S. (2002). Afrontamiento del estrés. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 11(2), 105- 112. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-07704-002

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. Springer.

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519

Martínez, I. M., Meneghel, I., & Peñalver, J. (2019). ¿El género afecta en las estrategias de afrontamiento para mejorar el bienestar y el desempeño académico?. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. psicod.2019.01.003

Mikulic, I. M. (1998). Ecoevaluación Psicológica del Exdelincuente en su Ambiente Natural. [Tesis de doctorado no publicada]. Universidad de Belgrano.

Mikulic, I. M., & Crespi, M. C. (2008). Adaptación y Validación del Inventario de Respuestas de Afrontamiento de Moos (CRI-A) para adultos. Anuario de investigaciones, 15, 305-312. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3691/369139944030.pdf

Mikulic, I. M., Casullo, G., Radusky, P., & Caballero, R. (2015). Fiabilidad de un sistema de categorías de situaciones estresantes y análisis diferencial en población adulta de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Anuario de Investigaciones, 22, 319-325. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3691/369147944033.pd

Monticone, M., Giordano, A., & Franchignoni, F. (2021). Scale Shortening and Decrease in Measurement Precision: Analysis of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Its Short Forms in an Italian-Speaking Population With Neck Pain Disorders. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 101(6), pzab039. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab039

Moos, R. H. (1993). Coping responses Inventory: Adult Form: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Müller, P., & Schäfer, S. (2017). Latent Mean (Comparison). En J. Matthes, C. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1-7). Wiley.

Ondé, D., & Alvarado, J. M. (2022). Contribución de los Modelos Factoriales Confirmatorios a la Evaluación de Estructura Interna desde la Perspectiva de la Validez. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 5(66), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP66.5.01

Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de muestreo sobre una población a estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037

Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of health and social behavior, 19(1), 2-21. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2136319 Pérez, D. O. (2020). Revisión del concepto de causalidad en el marco del Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 1(54), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP54.1.09

Pfeiffer, P. E. (1990). Variance and Standard Deviation. En P. E. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Probability for Applications (pp. 355-370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7676-1_19

Phelps, S. B., & Jarvis, P.A. (1994). Coping in adolescence: Empirical evidence for a theoretically based approach to assessing coping. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23, 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536724

R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing (versión 4.1) [software]. https:// cran.r-project.org

Rana, I. A., Bhatti, S. S., Aslam, A. B., Jamshed, A., Ahmad, J., & Shah, A. A. (2021). COVID-19 risk perception and coping mechanisms: Does gender make a difference?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55, 102096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102096

Rettie, H., & Daniels, J. (2021). Coping and tolerance of uncertainty: Predictors and mediators of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(3), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000710

Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354-373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315

Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2006). Evaluación del afrontamiento en niños de 8 a 12 años. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 23(2), 193-201. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/bitstream/handle/11336/102464/CONICET_Digital_Nro.145f6350- a05b-4211-b5c1-bec9a567a5ad_B.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y

Rodríguez, M. N., & Ruiz, M. A. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental, 29(2), 205-227. https://www.uv.es/psicologica/articulos2.08/6RODRIGUEZ.pdf

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1428-1441. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000623

Senado y Cámara de Diputados de la Nación Argentina. (2000). Protección de los datos personales. Ley 25.326. https:// www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/arg_ley25326.pdf

Selye, H. (2013). Stress in Health and Disease. Butterworth-Heinemann.

##submission.citations.for##