Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener prototipos de personalidad en población general de México y comparar la salud subjetiva entre ellos. En total, participaron 994 individuos de 14 a 63 años de edad. Se evaluaron cinco rasgos de personalidad (Neuroticismo, Extraversión, Apertura, Responsabilidad y Amabilidad) con el NEO-FFI, y la salud subjetiva con el GHQ-12 y una pregunta sobre el estado de salud. Para corroborar la consistencia de los prototipos se dividió la muestra en dos grupos de edad: joven (de 14 a 25 años) y maduro (de 26 a 63 años). Y como resultado se recuperaron tres prototipos en ambos grupos: las personas Resilientes bajo neuroticismo y alto en el resto de los rasgos, quienes tuvieron la mejor salud subjetiva; lasNo-Resilientes alto neuroticismo y bajo en el resto de los rasgos, que presentaron la peor salud subjetiva; y las personas disciplinadas alto en responsabilidad y promedio en los otros rasgos, que presentaron una salud subjetiva intermedia en comparación con los otros prototipos. Finalmente, la autodisciplina y la resiliencia fueron los rasgos que discriminaron mejor la buena salud. Los hallazgos se discuten en términos de la generalización de prototipos a través de culturas.

Palabras clave:

No-resiliente Personalidad Prototipos Resiliente Salud Disciplinado

Citas

Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III, Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2004). Personality, perceived parental rejection and problem behavior in adolescence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 980-988.

Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III., Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Co-occurrence of depression and delinquency in personality types. European Journal of Personality, 21, 235-256.

Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara G. V. & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340-353.

Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorpf, F. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both child and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169-198. doi: 10.1002/per.408

Avdeyeva, T. V. & Church, A. T. (2005). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study. European Journal of Personality, 19, 475-499.

Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, s43-s55.

Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B. & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, s25-s41.

Borkenau, P., Hrebícková, M., Kuppens, P., Realo, A. & Allik, J. (2013). Sex differences in variability in personality: A study in four samples. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 49-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00784.x

Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development accross the life course. En W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311-388). New York: Wiley.

Chapman, B. P. & Goldberg, L. G. (2011). Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 593-606. doi: 10.1037/a0024289

Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. (2008). Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual Profesional (3ra. edición revisada y ampliada). Madrid, España: TEA Ediciones S. A.

De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I. & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, s57-s72. doi: 10.1002/per.444

Díaz-Guerrero, R. (2012). Psicología del Mexicano. Descubrimiento de la etnopsicología (6ta. ed., reimpresión). México, DF: Trillas.

Donnellan, M. B. & Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3, 1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x

Ekehammar, B. & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centered approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449-464. doi: 10.1002/per.494

García, O. Aluja, A. & García, L. F. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Goldberg's 50 Personality Markers for the Big Five Model: A study in Spanish language. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 310-319.

Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

González, S., Tello, J., Silva, P., Lüders, C., Butelmann, S., Fristch, R., Solar, F., et al. (2012). Calidad de vida en pacientes con discapacidad motora según factores sociodemográficos y salud mental. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 50 (1), 23-34.

Hankins, M. (2008). The reliability of the twelve-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions. BMC Public Health, 8, 355.

Hart, D., Burock, D., London, B., Atkins, R. & Bonilla-Santiago, G. (2005). The relation of personality types to physiological, behavioural, and cognitive processes. European Journal of Personality, 19, 391-407.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. (5ta. ed.). Peru: McGraw-Hill.

Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond accident-proneness: Using five-factor model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.008

Herzberg, P. Y. & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20, 5-28. doi: 10.1002/per.557

Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Personality and self-regulation. En Rick H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 1-18). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Isler, L., Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G. & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2016). Self-Regulation and personality profiles: Empirical development, longitudinal stability and predictive ability. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 274-287. doi: 10.1002/per.2054

Kaleta, D., PolaTska, K., Dziankowska-Zaborszcsyk, E., Hanke, W. & Drygas, W. (2009). Factors influencing self-perception of health status. Central European Journal of Public Health, 17(3), 122-127.

Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., Leppänen, E., et al. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, 512-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00969.x

Klimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W.. III, Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). A developmental typology of adolescent personality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 309-323.

McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health? a guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3ª.ed.). New York: Oxford Press.

Miller, J. D. (2012). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes: A review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(6), 1565-1591.

Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A. & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345.

Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157-171.

Roth, M. & von Collani, G. (2007). A head-to-head comparison of big five types and traits in the prediction of social attitudes: Further evidence for a five-cluster typology. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 138-149.

Sánchez-López, M. P. & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20 (4), 839-843.

Smith, T. W., Williams, P. G. & Segerstrom, S. C. (2015). Personality and physical health. En M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Editors-in-Chief), Handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 639-661. Washington: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14343-029

Smith, A. B., Oluboyede, Y., West, R., Hewison, J. & House, A. O. (2013). The factor structure of the GHQ-12: the interaction between item phrasing, variance and levels of distress. Quality of Life Research, 22, 145-152.

Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología. (2007). Código ÿtico del Psicólogo. México: Trillas.

Solís-Cámara, P., Meda Lara, R. M., Moreno-Jiménez, B. & Juárez, P. (2016). Estructura factorial del Cuestionario de Salud General GHQ-12 en población general de México. Salud & Sociedad, 7(1), 62-76.

Steca, P., Alessandri, G. & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well-known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 442-446.

Steinley, D. (2003). Local optima in K-means clustering: What you don?t know may hurt you. Psychological Methods, 8, 294-304.

Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. & Rowinski, T. (2014). The circumplex of personality metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the big five. Review of General Psychology 18, (4), 273-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017

Tuuliainen/Kirsi Sipilä, L., Mäki, P., Könönen, M. & Suominen, A. L. (2015). Association between clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders and psychological distress among an adult Finnish population. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache, 29(4), 370-377. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1439

Urzúa, A., Caqueo-Urízar, A., Bargsted, M. & Irarrázaval, M. (2015). ¿Afecta la forma de puntuación la estructura factorial de GHQ-12? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(6), 1305-1312.

Van Leeuwen, K., De Fruyt, F. & Mervielde, I. (2004). A longitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children’s and adolescents’ problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210-220. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/01650254.html

Weir, R. C. & Gjerde, P. F. (2002). Preschool personality prototypes: Internal coherence, cross-study replicability, and developmental outcomes in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1229-1241.

Xie, X., Chen,W., Lei, L., Xing, C. & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 56-61.

Zawadzki, B. & Strelau, J. (2003). Trzy podstawowe typy czy cztery struktury temperamentu’ [Three basic types or four structures of temperament?]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 271-285.

##submission.citations.for##