How to Cite
Lovo Martins, L. A., Costa Hübner, M. M., Pereira Gomes, F., Pinto Portugal, M., & Treu, K. E. (2015). Effect of the qualifying autoclitic “is” in conditional discrimination training and equivalence tests. Acta Colombiana De Psicología, 18(1), 37–46.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

 Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).

 Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.


Reinforcement contingencies have been identified as an important variable for the establishment of conditional discriminations and stimuli equivalence. Studies in this area suggest that verbal behavior can facilitate the formation of discriminative responses and equivalence classes. Nevertheless, researchers have concentrated on studying the effect of the autoclitic behavior on those behavioral processes. The purpose of the present study was to analyze if an instruction that guides the participants to emit a verbal vocal response with a qualifying autoclitic and the assertion “is” between the presentation of the sample stimuli and the choice of the comparison stimuli in a matching to sample task, produces effects in the formation of new equivalence classes and has an influence on the number of trials necessary for the acquisition of conditional discrimination responses. The participants were divided into a Control Group and a Experimental Group where both of them went through three Training Phases and three Quiz Phases. The instruction was given only to the participants in the Experimental Group. The results obtained didn’t show differences between the groups for the average of correct responses in the Training Phases nor in the average of correct responses during all of the Equivalence Quizzes. It can be concluded that the initial effect of the autoclitic was to increase the accuracy of the response, making easier the acquisition of the conditional discrimination as well as the formation of the stimuli equivalence.



Bandini, C.S.M.; de ROSE, J.C.C. (2006). Tecnología comportamental no contexto de ensino: favorecimento da aprendizagem e do surgimento de comportamentos criativos. In: Helio José Guilhardi; Noreen Campbell de Aguirre. (Org.). Sobre comportamento e Cognição: Expondo a variabilidade. 1 ed. Santo André: ESETEC - Editores Associados, v. 17, p. 72-80.

Braam, C., & Malott, R. W. (1990). l do it when the snow melts?: The effects of deadlines and delayed outcomes on rules-governed behavior in preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 67-76.

Catania, A. C. (1980). Autoclitic processes and the structure of behavior. Behaviorism, 8(2), 175-186.

Catania, A. C. (2003). Verbal Governance, verbal shaping, and attention to verbal stimuli. In K. A. Lattal, & P. N. Chase (Orgs.), Behavior Theory and Philosophy (pp. 301-321). New York: Plenum Publishers.

Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38(3), 233-248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-233

De Rose, J. C. (1996). Controlling Factors in Conditional Discriminations and Test of Equivalence. Advances in Psychology, 253-277.

Faleiros, T. C., & Hübner, M. M. C. (2007). Efeitos do reforçamento diferencial de respostas verbais referente à leitura sobre a duração da resposta de ler. Revista Brasileira de Psicoterapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 9(2), 307-316.

Hübner, M. M. C., Austin, J., & Miguel, C. F. (2008). The effects of praising qualifying autoclitics on the frequency of reading. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 55-62.

Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., & Catania, A. C. (1987). Saying and doing: a contingency-space analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 69-74.

Rosales-Ruiz, J., Eikeseth, S., Duarte, A., & Baer, D. M. (2000). Verbs and verb phrases as instructional stimuli in the control of stimulus-equivalence effects. The Psychological Record, 50(1), 173-187.

Sheyab, M.; Pritchard J.& Malady, M. (2014). An Extension of the Effects of Praising Positive Qualifying Autoclitics on the Frequency of Reading. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 141-147.

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Englewood: PrenticeHall. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of Reinforcement: a theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.


Download data is not yet available.

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |