How to Cite
Guerrero Radillo, A. P., & Ortiz Rueda, G. (2007). Function of feedback and instructions presence or absence in description elaboration on conditional discrimination tasks. Acta Colombiana De Psicología, 10(1), 5–13. Retrieved from

 Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

 Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).

 Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.


The function of rules and instructions to facilitate, maintain or modify the behaviour of individuals has been widely explored in a great variety of tasks. Both rules and instructions, independently of the properties and characteristics that are attributed to them, can be seen as descriptions of the contingencies or the relations between several elements of a situation that the subject has faced or will face. The present study explored the effects of feedback density and presence or absence of generic instructions with respect to the response component on post-contact descriptions (i.e. rules) of sixteen university students, using a first order matching-to-sample task. Results were consistent with other studies in relation to the effects of instructional precision (i.e. high executions under precise instructions) and density of feedback. At the same time, the presence of a greater number of pertinent type post-contact descriptions was observed, contrary to previous research findings. Results suggest an effect of instructional precision and change in feedback density on post-contingency contact descriptions.



Andronis, P. (1991) Rule Governance: Enough to make a term mean. En: L.J. Hayes y P.N. Chase (Eds.) Dialogues on Verbal Behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press. Pp. 226- 235.

Buskist, W.F. y Miller, H.L. (1986). Interaction between rule and contingencies in the control of human fixed-interval performance. The Psychological Record, 36, 109-116.

Buchwald, A. M. (1969). Effects of “right” and “wrong” on subsequent behavior: A new interpretation. Psychological Review, 76, 132-143.

Cerutti, D. T. (1989) Discrimination theory of Rule- Governed Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259-276.

Chase, P. N. y Danfort, J.S. (1991) The role of rules in concept learning. En: L.J. Hayes y P.N. Chase (Eds.) Dialogues on Verbal Behavior (Pp. 226- 235). Reno, NV: Context Press.

Critchfield, T.S., Tucker, J.A. y Vuchinich, R.E. (1998). Self Report Methods. En: K. A. Lattal y M. Perone (Eds.) Handbook of research Methods in human operant Behavior. (Pp.435- 470). USA; Plenum Press.

Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53-70.

Goldstein, I.L., Emanuel, J. T. y Howell, W. (1968). Effect of percentage and specificity of feedback on choice behavior in a probabilistic information processing task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 163-168.

Hayes, S.C., Brownstein, A.J., Zettle, R.D., Rosenfarb, I. y Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Ana lysis of Behavior, 45, 237-256.

Martínez, H., Ortiz, G. y González, A. (2002). Precisión instruccional, retroalimentación y eficacia: Efectos sobre el entrenamiento y transferencia en una tarea de discriminación condicional en adultos. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 8, 7-33.

Ortiz, G., González, A. y Rosas, M. (en revisión). Una taxonomía para el análisis de descripciones pre y post contacto con arreglos contingenciales. Acta Colombiana de Psicología.

Ortiz, G., González, A., Rosas, M. y Alcaraz, F. (2006). Efectos de la precisión instruccional y la densidad de retroalimentación sobre el seguimiento instruccional, la elaboración y transmisión de descripciones en tareas de discriminación condicional. Acta Comportamentalia, 14, 2, 103-130.

Ribes, E. y Martínez, H. (1990). Interaction of contingencies and rule instructions in the performance of human subjects in conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record, 40, 565-586.

Ribes, E. y Rodríguez, M. E. (1999). “Análisis de la correspondencia entre instrucciones, estímulos, ejecución, descripciones y retroalimentación en la adquisición y transferencia de una discriminación condicional de segundo orden”. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta 25, 351-377.

Ribes, E. y Rodríguez, M.E. (2001). Correspondence between interactions, performance, and self-descriptions in a conditional discrimination task: The effects of feedback and type of matching response. The Psychological Record, 51, 309-333.

Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.

Shimoff, E. y Catania, A.C. (1998). The verbal governance of behavior. En: K. A. Lattal y M. Perone (Eds.) Handbook of research Methods in human operant Behavior (Pp. 371-404). USA: Plenum Press.

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.


Download data is not yet available.

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |