Epistemological perspectives in the scientific study and evaluation of executive function.

Abstract

In this article, epistemological perspectives that have shaped and affected the scientific quest for understanding what neuropsychologists term “executive functions” are reviewed. Executive functions refer to the control functions of cognition and behavior. The underlying thesis of the paper is that one’s epistemological orientation determines how one sees the interaction between brain functions and our status in the world. Each different orientation thus carries with it implications with regard to how executive functions operate, as well as how, therefore, one should try to assess them. Until recently, these functions were approached through two primary epistemological points of view. One is analytic, which has its roots in the positivistic movement. The other approach is synthetic, otherwise known as “romantic science”, and forms the basis of the work of the prominent Russian neuropsychologist A.R. Luria. A third epistemological perspective, articulated under the umbrella of ‘embodied cognition’ approaches, has been advanced in the last 20 years, and is associated most closely with the work of Francisco Varela. A review of, and reflection on how these perspectives have affected research and clinical practice in neuropsychology is provided.

Keywords:

Executive functions Neurophenomenology Neuropsychology Embodied cognition Epistemology Classical science Romantic science Clinical evaluation

References

Armengol, C.G. (2007). Executive functions in Hispanics: Towards an ecological neuro-psychology. In: B.P. Uzzell, M. Ponton & A. Ardila (Eds.), International Handbook of Cross-cultural Neuropsychology (pp.163-180). Nahawah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Armengol, C.G., Kaplan, E. & Moes, E.J. (2003). Neuropsychological Assessment. In: R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Assessment. London, England: Sage.

Bechara, A., Damasio, H.,Tranel, D. & Damasio, A.R. (2007). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275,1293-1295.

Bechara, A., Damasio, H. & Damasio, A.R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitogrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 295-307.

Benton, A.L. (1991). The prefrontal region: Its early history. In: H.S. Lewis, H. M. Eisenberg & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 3-32). New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Bilder, R.M. (2012). Executive control: Balancing stability and flexibility via the duality of evolutionary neuroanatomical trends. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14, 39-47.

Boring, E.G. (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Christensen, A.L. (1975). Luria’s neuropsychological investigation. New York, N.Y.: Spectrum.

Cole, M. (1990). Alexandr Romanovich Luria: Cultural psychologist. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 11-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cowart, M. (2005). Embodied Cognition. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ISSN 2161- 0002, http://www.iep.utm.edu/embodcog/.

Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, N.Y.: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

Delis, D. & Kaplan, E. (1982). The assessment of aphasia with the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: A case critique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 32-39.

Delis, D.C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J.H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Denckla, M.B. (1996). AS theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In: G.R. Lyon and N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, Memory and Executive Functions (pp. 263-278). Baltimore: Brookes.

Fortuny, L.A.I., Garolera, M., Hermosillo, D., et. al. (2005). Research with Spanish-speaking populations in the United States: Lost in the translation; a commentary and a plea. Neuropsychology, 27, 555- 564.

Goldberg, E. (1990a). Tribute to Alexander Romanovich Luria (1902-1977). In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldberg, E. (1990b). Higher cortical functions in humans: A gradient approach. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Golden, C.G., Purisch, A.D. & Hammeke, T.A. (1985). A Manual for the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Forms I and II. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Guski-Leinwand, S. (2009). Becoming a science: The loss of the scientific approach of Völkerpsychologie. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal Of Psychology, 217, 79-84.

James, W. (1902/2012). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

Kaplan, E., (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll & B.K. Bryant (Eds.). Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice (pp. 129-167). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Kaplan, E. (2002). Serendipity in science: A personal account. In: T. Stringer, E. Cooley, & A. L. Christensen (Eds.), Pathways to Prominence in Neuropsychology: Reflections of Twentieth Century Pioneers. (pp. 157-170), New York, N.Y.: Psychology Press.

Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris. R. & Delis, D. (1991). WAIS-R as a Neuropsychological Instrument. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Lezak, M.D, Howieson, D., Bigler, E., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment (5th ed.). New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Luria, A.R. (1966). Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.

Luria, A.R. (1973a). The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.

Luria, A.R. (1973b). The frontal lobes and the regulation of behavior. In K. H. Pribran & A. R. Luria (Eds.), Psychophysiology of the Frontal Lobes. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.

Luria, A. R., Cole, M., & Cole, S. (1979).The Making of mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Manly, J.J., (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of separate norms for African Americans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 270–275.

McKay, P.F. (2003). The effects of demographic variables and stereotype threat on Black/White differences in cognitive ability test performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 1–14.

McNerney, S. (2011). A brief guide to embodied cognition: why you are not your brain. Scientific American, Nov. 4,1.

Manrique-Tisnés, H. (2008). Saber y conocimiento: Una aproximación plural. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 11, 89-100.

Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Murzi, M. (2005). The Vienna Circle. Available at http://www.iep.utm.edu/v/viennaci.htm. Accessed May 18, 2014.

Pribram, K.H. (1973). The primate frontal cortex-executive of the brain. In: K.H. Pribram & A.R. Luria (Eds.). Psychophysiology of the Frontal Lobes (pp. 293-231). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Pribram, K.H. (1990). The frontal cortex-A Luria/Pribram rapprochement. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Comtemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ribe, N. & Steinle, F. (2002). Exploratory experimentation: Goethe, Land, and color theory. Physics Today, 55, 43.

Richardson, A. (2001). British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks, O. (1990). Luria and “romantic science.” In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary Neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sedó, M.A. (2007). FTD- Test de los Cinco Dígitos. Madrid, Spain: TEA Editores.

Sedó, M.A. & DeCristóforo, L. (2001). All language verbal tests free from linguistic barriers. Revista Española de Neuropsicología, 3, 68-82.

Sepper, D.L. (2005) Goethe and the Poetics of Science. Janus Head, 8, 207-227.

Spiers, P. A. (1981). Have they come to praise Luria or to bury him? The Luria-Nebraska Battery controversy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 331-341.

Stanley, S (2012). Intimate distances: William James’ introspection, Buddhist mindfulness, and experiential inquiry. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 201-211.

Taylor, E.I. (2012). Science, philosophy and religion in psychology, the legacy of William James, In: W.R. Rieber (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories. (pp. 976-984). New York, N.Y.: Springer.

Varela, F.J., Thompson, E & Rosch, E. (1991) The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Varela, F.J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330-349.

Wahl, D.C. (2005). “Zartre Empirie”: Goethean Science as a Way of Knowing. Janus Head, 8, 58-76.

Welsh, M.C., & Pennington, B.F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 199-230.

Wikipedia, Color Theory. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_theory. Retrieved May 8, 2014.

Wilson, R. A. & Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Wong, W. (2009). Retracing the footsteps of Wilhelm Wundt: Explorations in the disciplinary frontiers of psychology and in Völkerpsychologie. History of Psychology, 12, 229-265.

Reference by