PDF
FLIP
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).
Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.
Abstract
Strongly rooted in the sociological tradition of social psychology, Social Representations Theory (SRT) has been developing since the sixties as a useful theoretical and practical multidisciplinary social research tool, particularly in European and Latin American contexts. However, since the end of the nineties, and following the consolidation of Social Representations Theory, there has been an important effort to bridge this perspective with other important contemporary critical theories given its emphasis on the way in which social subjects, groups and society as a whole construct and transform meaning rooted in preexisting knowledge and everyday experience. One of the most prolific and promising exchanges has been established between Social Representations Theory and gender equitable research. This article revises the premises of SRT in order to suggest its relevance for and linkages with diverse studies rooted in a gender perspective with a clear equity goal.
References
Abric, J. C. (1994). Prácticas sociales y representaciones, Mexico City: Ediciones Coyoacán.
Álvarez Bermúdez, J. (2004). El Contexto social y teórico del surgimiento de la teoría de las representaciones sociales. Romero Rodríguez, E. (Ed.), Representaciones Sociales: Atisbos y cavilaciones del devenir de cuatro décadas (pp. 29-53). Puebla: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP).
Arendt, H. (1998 [1958]). The Human Condition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Arruda, A. (org.) (2002 [1998]). Representando a Alteridade, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes.
Arruda, A. (2010). Teoría de Representaciones Sociales y teorías de género. Blazquez Graf, N., Flores Palacios, F., & Ríos Everardo, M. (Coords.). Investigación Feminista: Epistemología, metodología y representaciones sociales (pp. 317-338). Mexico City: CEIICH-CRIM-Facultad de Psicología, UNAM.
Banchs, M. A. (2000). Aproximaciones Procesuales y Estructurales al estudio de las Representaciones Sociales. Papers on Social Representations, 9, e3.1- e3.15.
Bauer, M., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 2, 163-186.
Deaux, K., & Philogène, G. (Eds.) (2001). Representations of the Social, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Duveen, G. (1997). Psychological Developmental as a Social Process. In Smith, L., Dockerell, J., & Tomlinson, P. (Eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond. London: Routledge.
Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, Identities and resistance. Deaux, K., & Philogène, G. (Eds.), Representations of the Social (pp. 257-271). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (Eds.) (1990). Social representations and the development of knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1986). The significance of social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 219-230.
Farr, R. M. (1996). The Roots of Modern Social Psychology, Oxford: Blackwell.
Farr, R. M., & Moscovici, S. (Eds.) (1984). Social Representations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Flores Palacios, F. (2001). Psicología social y género, México City: McGraw Hill/dgapa/UNAM.
Flores Palacios, F. (2010). Representación Social y género; una relación de sentido común. Blazquez Graf, N., Flores Palacios, F., & Ríos Everardo, M. (Coords.), Investigación Feminista: Epistemología, metodología y representaciones sociales (pp. 339-358). Mexico City: CEIICH-CRIM-Facultad de Psicología, UNAM.
Giménez Montiel, G. (2005). Teoría y Análisis de la Cultura: Vol. I & II, Mexico City: CONACULTA/ICOCULT.
Goetz, J. (1972). Symbolique Cosmobiologique, mimeo, Istituto delle Scienze Sociali, Departamento de Etnosociología, Roma.
Herzlich, C., & Graham, D. (1973). Health and illness: A social psychological analysis, London: Academic Press.
Hewstone, M., & Augoustinos, M. (1998). Social attributions and social representations. Flick, U. (Ed.), The Psychology of the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howarth, C. (2002a). ‘So, you’re from Brixton?’ The Struggle for Recognition and Esteem in a Multicultural Community. Ethnicities, 2, 2, 237- 260.
Howarth, C. (2002b). Identity in Whose Eyes? The Role of Representations in Identity Construction. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32, 2, 145- 162.
Jodelet, D. (2004). Experiencia y representaciones sociales. Romero, E. (Ed.), Representaciones sociales: Atisbos y cavilaciones del devenir de cuatro décadas. Puebla: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.
Jodelet, D. (1989). Folies et Représentations Sociales, Paris: PUF.
Jodelet, D. (1988 [1986]). La representación social: fenómeno, concepto y teoría. In Moscovici, S., Psicología Social II, Barcelona: Paidós.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007 [2002]). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture, London: Routeldge.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007 [2001]). Social representations, public life and social construction. In Deaux, K., & Philogene, G. (Eds.), Representations of the social, London: Blackwell Publications.
Lloyd, B., & Duveen, G. (1992). Gender Identities and Education: The Impact of Schooling, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Marková, I. (1982). Paradigms, Thought and Language, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Mead, G. H. (1962 [1932]). Mind, Self, and Society: From the standpoint of a social behaviourist, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moscovici, S. (2000). Explorations in social psychology, London: Polity Press.
Moscovici, S. (1998). Social consciousness and its history. Culture and Psychology, 4, 411-429.
Moscovici, S. (1993). The Invention of Society: Psychological Explanations for Social Phenomena, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Moscovici, S. (1976). La Psychanalyse: Son image et son public, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Moscovici, S. (1973). Prefacio. In Herzlich, C., & Graham, D., Health and illness: A social psychological analysis. London: Academic Press.
Serrano Oswald, S. E. (2010). La Construcción Social y Cultural de la Maternidad en San Martín Tilcajete, Oaxaca, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute for Anthropological Research, Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City.
Torres López, T. M. (2002). Una aproximación cualitativa al estudio de las enfermedades crónicas: las representaciones sociales. Revista Universidad de Guadalajara, 23, spring, 35-44.
Wagner, W., & Hayes, N. (2011). El discurso cotidiano y el sentido común: la teoría de las representaciones sociales, Barcelona: CRIM-UNAM/Anthropos.
Wagner, W., & Kronberger, N. (2001). Killer Tomatoes! Collective Symbolic Coping with Biotechnology. Deaux, K., & Philogène, G. (Eds.), Representations of the Social (pp. 147-165). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (Eds.) (1984). Handbook of Social Cognition, London: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Reference by
