How to Cite
Cruz, J. E., & Pérez Acosta, A. M. (2002). Técnicas experimentales aplicadas al condicionamiento clásico de preferencias en el comportamiento del consumidor. Acta Colombiana De Psicología, (8), 75–87. Retrieved from https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1949
License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

 Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).

 Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.

Abstract

Classical conditioning (CC) is one of the most emblematic developments of experimental psychology and psychological science. CC has implied to its area of knowledge: a matter of research, a set of concepts, a methodology, and, finally, a series of technological and instrumental developments. Like investigation strategy, CC has been used in the study of a great diversity of processes like perception, learning, memory, and thought. In the same way, CC is a procedure that has been extended to an important number of application fields where it looks for to take part on concrete behavior changes. More specifically, in the field of consumer behavior, CC are one of the most influential paradigms because its great utility in the explanation on how preferences on goods and services are acquired and modified. This article pretends introduce to the experimental procedures in CC and CC of preferences, in order to indicate their concepts, variables, special phenomena, and research opportunities.

Keywords:

References

Baker, W. D. (1999). When can affective conditioning and mere exposure directly influence brand choice? Journal of Advertising, 28, 31-46.

Domjan, M. (1999). Principios de aprendizaje y conducta.(4a. Ed.). México: Thompson.

Froufe, M. & Sierra, B. (1998). Condicionamiento clásico de las preferencias. Implicaciones para la publicidad. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 51, 85-104.

Olson, M. A. & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413 - 417.

Shimp, T. A. (1991). Neo-Pavlovian conditioning and the evaluative response: implications for consumer theory and research. En T. S. Robertson & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer theory and research (pp. 162-187). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.

Smith, P. W., Feinberg, R. A. & Burns, D. J. (1998). Conditioning principles in an ecologically valid advertising context. Journal of Marketing. Theory and Practice, 6, 63-72.

Tarpy, R. M. (2000). Aprendizaje: Teoría e investigación contemporánea. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

Till, B. D. & Lynn Priluck, R. (2000). Stimulus generalization in classical conditioning: An initial investigation and extension. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 55-72.

Van Osselaer, S. M. & Janiszewski, C. (2001). Two ways of learning brand associations. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 202-223.

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |