Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).
Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the motivational self-regulatory strategies used by college students in mathematics courses as well as to examine the relationships between their motivational beliefs and the said motivational self-regulatory strategies. Also, to explore the relationship between such strategies and the students’ perception of certain aspects of the classroom environment. To this end, 224 college students completed two self-report instruments to measure their motivational beliefs and self-regulatory motivation strategies. Results from a repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that students used self-regulatory motivation strategies to varying degrees (F (3.607, 804.343) = 96.188, p = .000, p2 = 0. 301); that the motivational beliefs of performance goal orientation and learning value orientation explained 30% of the variance of the performance goal regulation strategy (F (2, 221) = 48,193, p = 0.000), as well as 29% of the variance of the task value regulation (F (2, 221) = 45,343, p = 0.000). Last, the study identifies plausible relationships between the self-regulatory motivational strategies used by students and aspects of the classroom environment such as the level of promotion of meaningful learning, the type of goals promoted in class, and the support offered by the teacher. This study makes a novel contribution by providing the student´s perspective on the classroom environment, and its relationship with strategies chosen by the students.
References
Adams, C., Forsyth, P., Dollarhide, E., Miskell, R., & Ware, J. (2015). Self-regulatory climate: A social resource for student regulation and achievement. Teacher College Record, 117(2), 1-28. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17782
Alarcón Díaz, M. A. (2013). Motivación, estrategias de aprendizaje y metacomprensión lectora: un estudio descriptivo en alumnos universitarios peruanos. Revista De Educación y Desarrollo Social, 7(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.18359/reds.735
Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-nomal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29(4), 552-557. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2016.383
Castro, E., & Miranda, I. (2019). Experiencias desmotivacionales y motivacionales de estudiantes varones de ingeniería para estudiar matemáticas. El caso de la Universidad Andrés Bello en Santiago de Chile. Formación Universitaria, 12(6), 83-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-50062019000600083
Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J, & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 88-99. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.001
Creswell, J. W. y Plano, V. L. (2011). Choosing a Mixed Methods Research Design. En J. W. Creswell y V. L. Plano (Eds.), Designing and conducting mixed methods research (pp.53-106). California: SAGE publications.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum
Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational belief, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J., and Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Eckerlin, N., Roth, A., Engelschalk, T., Steuer, G., Schmitz, B., & Dresel, M. (2019). The Role of Motivational Regulation in Exam Preparation: Results from a Standardized Diary Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(81), 1-9. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00081
Fast, L., Lewis, J., Bryant, M., Bocian, K., Cardullo, R., Rettig, M., & Hammond, K. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 729-740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018863
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10. ª ed.). Pearson
Hulleman, C., Godes, O., Hendricks, B., & Harackiewicz, J. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Education Psychology, 102(4), 880-895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019506
Kim, Y., Brady, A., & Wolters, C. (2018). Development and validation of the brief regulation of motivation scale. Learning and Individual Differences. Publicación anticipada en línea. 67, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.010
Lam, A., Ruzek, E., Schenke, K., Conley, A., & Karabenick, S. (2015). Student Perceptions of Classroom Achievement Goal Structure : Is It Appropriate to Aggregate?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4),102-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000028
Ley 1090 de 2006. Por la cual se reglamenta el ejercicio de la profesión de Psicología, se dicta el Código Deontológico y Bioético y otras disposiciones. Diario oficial N. 46383 de 6 de septiembre de 2006. Congreso de la República de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestor normativo/norma_pdf.php?i=66205
Martín, A., & Montero, I. (2019). Variables motivacionales y cognitivas predictivas del rendimiento en estudiantes universitarios de ciencias de la salud. Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior, 33(1), 1-29. http://scielo. sld.cu/pdf/ems/v33n1/1561-2902-ems-33-01-e1397.pdf
Martín, E., García, L. A., Torbay, A., & Rodríguez, T. (2008). Estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8(3), 401-412. https://www.ijpsy.com/volumen8/num3/213/estrategias-de-aprendizajey-rendimiento-ES.pdf
Meece, J., Anderman, E., & Anderman, L. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
Melo, L., Ramos, J., y Hernández, P. (2017). La educación superior en Colombia: situación actual y análisis de eficiencia. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, 78, 59-111. https://doi.org/10.13043/dys.78.2
Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). (2016). Reporte sobre deserción y graduación en educación superior año 2016. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/sistemasdeinformacion/1735/articles-357549_recurso_5.pdf
Ministerio de Educación Colombia (MEN). (2017). Resumen ejecutivo Colombia en PISA 2015. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Bogotá D. C.
Moreno-Murcia, J. & Torregrosa, Y. (2015). Perfiles motivacionales de estudiantes universitarios. Procesos de estudio y satisfacción con la vida. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 18(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.18.3.200441
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD (2016) Pisa 2015: Resultados Clave. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus-ESP.pdf
Patrick, H., Kaplan, A., & Ryan, A. M. (2011). Positive classroom motivational environments: Convergence between mastery goal structure and classroom social climate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 367-382. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0023311
Peréz, J., & Franco-Mariscal, A. (2019). Motivación y rendimiento académico en formación profesional. Un estudio preliminar en el ciclo formativo de grado medio auxiliar de enfermería. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 6(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.21071/ij21ce. v6i1.12154
Peters, M. (2013). Examing the relationships among classroom climate, self-efficacy and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: a multilevel analysis. Internationa Journal of Science and Mathematic Education, 11(2), 459-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9347-y
Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge
Reindl, M., Berner, V. D., Scheunpflug, A., Zeinz, H., & Dresel, M. (2015). Effect of negative peer climate on the development of autonomous motivation in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 68-75. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.017
Resolución 8430 de 1993. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. 4 de octubre de 1993. Ministerio de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/ BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430- DE-1993.PDF
Rinaudo, M. C., Chiecher, A., & Donolo, D. (2003). Motivación y uso de estrategias en estudiantes universitarios. Su evaluación a partir del Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire. Anales de Psicología, 19(1), 107-119.
https://www.um.es/analesps/v19/v19_1/11-19_1.pdf
Rojas-Ospina, T. y Valencia, M. (en prensa). Adaptación y validación de un cuestionario sobre de estrategias de autorregulación de la motivación en estudiantes universitarios. Psykhe, 28(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.28.1.1128
Ruiz, K. G. (2015). Perfil agentivo de estudiantes con bajo rendimiento académico: estrategias cognitivas y de control del aprendizaje, autoeficacia académica y motivación. Informes Psicológicos, 15(1), 63-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.18566/infpsicv15n1a04
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsec motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporay Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The Classroom Social Environment and Changes in Adolescents? Motivation and Engagement During Middle School. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437
Sabogal, L., Barraza, E., Hernández, A., & Zapata, L. (2015).Validación del cuestionario de motivación y estrategias de aprendizaje forma corta-MSLQ SF, en estudiantes universitarios de una institución pública-Santa Marta. Psicogente, 14(25), 36-50. http://revistas.unisimon.edu.co/index.php/psicogente/article/view/1855
Schwinger, M., & Otterpohl, N. (2017). Which one work best? Considering the relative importance of motivational regulation strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.12.003
Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence. Learning and individual differences, 19(4), 621-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.006
Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome - Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 269-279. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006
Smit, K., Brabander, C., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. (2017). The self regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational belief and engagement for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 124-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.006
Sriklaub, K., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2015). Development of the Classroom Climate Measurement Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171(16), 1353-1359. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.253
Steingut, R., Patall, E., & Trimble, S. (2017). The effect of rationale provision on motivation and performance outcomes: A meta-analysis. Motivation Science, 3(1), 19-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000039
Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., & Millan, A. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02066.x
Velayutham, S., & Aldridge, J. M. (2013). Influence of Psychosocial Classroom Environment on Students? Motivation and Self-Regulation in Science Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 507-527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9273-y
Wang, M. (2012). Educational and Career Interests in Math: A Longitudinal Examination of the Links Between Classroom Environment, Motivational Beliefs, and Interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1643-1657. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027247
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Wolters, C. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students? regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224
Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281-299. https://doi. org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80004-1
Wolters, C. (2003). Regulation of Motivation: evaluating and underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
Wolters, C. & Benzon, M. (2013). Assessing and predicting college students? use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
Wolters, C., & Pintrich, P. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, english and social studies clasrooms. Instruction Science, 26, 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003035929216
Wolters, C. A. & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students? motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7-8), 801-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00051-3