How to Cite
Ossa, J. C. (2011). Cognitive functioning : an inextricable game of losses and gains. Acta Colombiana De Psicología, 14(2), 45–55. Retrieved from https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/344
License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

 Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).

 Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to refer to the Lotka-Volterra model (predator-prey) in order to address cognitive functioning and particularly classification as a mental operation. Logistic regression is used and a model is determined for explaining classification functioning in children four years old. Results show evidence pointing to an on linear function of classification. The children’s performance suggests a balance between the number of questions that the child makes and the mental operations that he must display to coordinate such information.

Keywords:

References

Arnau, J. (1999). Series temporales cortas y mínimos cuadrados generalizados: Análisis de la intervención. Revista de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento,1, 119-135.

Ausloos, M., & Dirickx, M. (2006). The logistic map and the route to chaos: From the beginnings to modern applications. The Netherlands: Springer.

Berryman, A. A. (1992). The origins and evolution of predatorprey theory. Ecology, 73, 1530-1535.

Combariza, E., & Puche-Navarro, R. (2009). El uso de la wavelet para el estudio de los funcionamientos inferenciales en niños pequeños. En R. Puche-Navarro (Comp.), ¿Es la mente no lineal? (pp. 111-133). Cali: Programa EditorialUniversidad del Valle.

Cramer, J. S. (2003). Logit models from economics and other fields. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cramer, J. S. (2004). The early origins of the logit model. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35, 613-626.

Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. (2006). Dynamic development of action and thought. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 313-399). NY: Wiley.

Fischer, K.W., & Kennedy, B. (1997). Tools for analyzing the many shapes of development: The case of self-in-relationships in Korea. In K. A. Renninger & E. Amsel (Eds.), Processes of development (pp. 117-152). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Gabriel, J. P., Saucy, F., & Bersier, L. F. (2005). Paradoxes in the logistic equation? Ecological Modeling, 185, 147-151.

Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1988). The theory of evolution and dynamical systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Holmes, P. (1990). Poincare, celestial mechanics, dynamicalsystems theory and “chaos”. Physics Reports,193, 137-163.

Howe, M. L., & Lewis, M. D. (2005). The importance of dynamic systems approaches for understanding development. Developmental Review, 25, 247-251.

Isaza, J. F., & Campos, D. (2006). Ecología: Una mirada desde los sistemas dinámicos. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

Lotka, A. J. (1925/1956). Elements of Mathematical Biology. NY: Dover Publications, Inc.

Malthus, T. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: Johnson.}

McCaig, C., Norman, R., & Shankland, C. (2008). Process algebra models of population dynamics. In K. Horimoto, G. Regensburger, M. Rosenkranz & H.Yoshida (Eds.), Algebraic biology (pp. 139–155). Berlin: Springer.

Mosher, F. A., & Hornsby, J. R. (1966). On asking questions. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Oliver, & P. M. Greenfield et al. (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth, (pp. 86-102). NY: Wiley.

Ossa, J. C., & Puche-Navarro, R. (2010). Modelos bayesianos y funcionamientos inferenciales complejos. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 13(2), 119-128.

Piaget, J. (1950).The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan.

Puche-Navarro, R. (2008). Érase una vez el desarrollo. En J. Larreamendy-Joerns, R. Puche-Navarro & A. RestrepoIbiza (Comp.), Claves para pensar el cambio: Ensayos sobre psicología del desarrollo (pp. 29-69). Bogotá: Editorial Universidad de los Andes.

Puche-Navarro, R., & Martí, E. (2011) Metodologías del cambio. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34, 131-139.

Rose, L. T., & Fischer, K. W. (2009). Dynamic development a neo piagetian approach. In J. I. M. Carpendale & L. Smith (Eds,). The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp.400- 424). NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Ross, J. V. (2009). A note on density dependence in population models. Ecological Modelling, 220, 3472-3474.

Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 343-348.

Spencer, J. P., & Perone, S. (2008). Defending qualitative change: The view from dynamical systems theory. Child Development, 79, 1639-1647.

Valsiner, J. (2004). El desarrollo de las teorías de desarrollo: La holywoodización de la ciencia y su impacto. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 27, 147-155.

Van der Maas, H.L.J., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99, 395-417.

Van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3-53.

Van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Van Geert, P. (1995). Growth dynamics in development. In R. F. Port &T. van Gelder (Eds.). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 313-337). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Van Geert, P. (1998). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of nonlinear dynamics to developmental science in the making. Developmental Science, 1, 143-159.

Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental Psychology (pp.640-672). London: Sage.

Van Geert, P.,& Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25, 408-442.

Verhulst, P. F. (1838). Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement. Correspondance mathématique et physique, 10, 113-121.

Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature, 118, 558–560.

Yan, Z., & Fischer, K. (2002). Dynamic growth modeling of human cognitive microdevelopment. In: Proc. 2nd International Conference on Development and Learning. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01011875

Yan, Z., & Fischer, K. (2007). Pattern emergence and pattern transition in microdevelopmental variation: Evidence of complex dynamics of developmental processes. Journal of Developmental Processes, 2, 39-62.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Reference by

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |