How to Cite
Moyano Díaz, E., Cornejo, F. A., & Gallardo, I. (2011). Environmental beliefs and behavior, economic liberalism and happiness. Acta Colombiana De Psicología, 14(2), 69–77. Retrieved from https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/346
License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

 Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).

 Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.

Abstract

We identified and analyzed environmental beliefs grouped under the terms ‘new environmental paradigm’ (NEP, Dunlap, Van Liere, Mertingen and Jones, 2000) about the environmental behavior, economic liberalism, religiosity and happiness in young people from a central valley region of Chile. A sample of 409 participants, with average of 33 years answered a battery of instruments consisting of the NEP-R which measures beliefs about the relationship between man and nature by twodimensional-centrism and anthropocentrism, Ecological Behavior Scale (EBS), Economic Liberalism Scale (ELS) and the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS). The rural or urban origin has no effect on any variables measured. The general beliefs in favor of the environment are positively related to ecological behavior (pro-environmental behavior) and subjective happiness, but not with economic liberalism (rs(409) ≥ 0.138, ps ≤ 0.041). The economic liberalism is correlated only with the beliefs about the anti-anthropocentric thinking (r(409) = 0.192, p = 0.004) so that those who are most economically liberal do not believe in the supremacy of man over nature. Those who subscribe to any religion have more ecocentric beliefs than who do not have, without sex or age differences were observed for other variables. Questions are raised and debate about these and other results.

Keywords:

References

Aragonés, J. I.; Sevillano, V. Cortés, B., &Amérigo, M. (2006). Cuestiones ambientales que se perciben como problemas. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 7, 1-19.

Bechtel, R., Corral-Verdugo, V., Asaic, M& González, A. (2006). Cross-cultural study of environmental belief structures in USA, Japan, Mexico and Peru. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 145-151.

Bechtel, R., Verdugo, V., & Pinheiro, J. (1999). Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 122-128.

Bodur, M. &Sarigollu, E. (2005). Environmental sensitivity in a developing country: Consumer c1assification and implications. Environmental Behavior, 37, 487-579.

Bostrom, A., Barke, R., Mohana, R., Turaga, R., & O’ Connor, R. (2006).Environmental Concerns and the New Environ mental Paradigm in Bulgaria. Journal of Environmental Education, 37, 25-40.

Byrka, K., Hartig, T., & Kaiser, F. G. (2010). Environmental attitude as a mediator of the relationship between psychological restoration in nature and self-reported ecological behavior. Psychological Reports, 107, 847-859.

Casey, P. J. & Scott, K. (2006). Environmental concern and behaviour in an Australian sample within an ecocentricanthropocentric framework. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, 57-67.

Celis, J. & Morales, J. (2007). Estudio de la contaminación del aire urbano en una ciudad intermedia: El caso de Chillán (Chile). Revista Atenea, 495, 165-182.

Comisión Brundtland, 1983. Comisión Mundial sobre el Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo: Reporte sobre Nuestro Futuro. NY: Organización de Naciones Unidas.

Comisión Nacional de Medio Ambiente. (2007). Mundo Rural, ciudades y núcleos urbanos. Manual de trabajo CONAMA, 5, vol 2.

Duffy, R. (2000). Shadow players: Ecotourism development, corruption and state politics in Belize. Third World Countries, 21, 549-565.

Dunlap R. E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of environmental education.40, 3-18.

Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Merting, A., & Jones, R. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.

Dunlap, R. (1980). Paradigmatic change in social science. American Behavior Science, 24, 5-14.

Dunlap, R. & Van Liere, K. (1978). The New Environmental Paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of EnvironmentalEducation, 9, 10-19.

Fadda, G. & Jirón, P. (2001). Calidad de vida y género en sectores populares urbanos. Un estudio de caso en Santiago de Chile: Síntesis final y conclusiones. Revista Invi. 16, 105-138.

García-Mira, R. & Real-Deus, E. (2001). Valores, actitudes y creencias: hacia un modelo predictivo del ambientalismo. Medioambiente y comportamientohumano, 2, 21-43.

Gooch, G. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior, 30, 513-539.

Hernández, B., Suárez, E., Martínez-Torvisco, J., & Hess, S. (1997). Actitudes y creencias sobre el medio ambiente en la conducta ecológica responsable. PapelesdelPsicólogo, 67, 48-54.

Hines, J., Hungerford, H., &Tomera, A. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of EnvironmentalEducation, 18, 1-18.

Jiménez, M. y Lafuente, R. (2007). La conciencia ambiental: Qué es y cómo medirla. Trabajo preparado para el IX Congreso Español de Sociología, grupo de trabajo 21: Sociología y Medio Ambiente, septiembre, España.

Jones, R. & Dunlap, R. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?. Rural Sociology, 57, 28-47.

Kals, E.; Schumacher, D., &Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature.Environment & Behavior,31, 178-202.

Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., &Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multi-national examination. Journal of Business Research, 55, 193-204.

Le Trobe, H. & Acott, T. (2000). Modified NEP/DSP Environmental Attitudes scale. Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 12-20.

Lewis, C.A., Maltby, J., & Day, L. (2005).Religious orientation, religious coping and happiness among UK adults.Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1193-1202.

Luck, M. (2003). The new environmental paradigm scale: has it outlived its usefulness?. Tourism Geographie, 5, 228-240.

Lyubomirsky, S. &Lepper, H. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.

Manoli, C., Johnson, B., & Dunlap, R. (2007). Validating the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for use with Children. Journal of Environmental Education, 38, 2-13.

Milbrath, L. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Milfont, T. & Duckitt, J. (2004). The structure of environmental attitudes: A first and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 289-303.

Moreno, M., Corraliza, J., & Ruíz, J. (2005). Escala de actitudes ambientales hacia problemas específicos. Psicothema, 17, 502-508.

Moyano, E., Maturana, B., & Villablanca, L. (2002). Actitud proambiental y reactividad de comunidades hacia la instalación de vertederos de basura en sus entornos. En J. Guevara y S. Mercado (coords.). Temas selectos de Psicología Ambiental. (pp. 411-441) México: UNAM–GRECO– UNILIBRE.

Moyano Díaz, E. (2010). Exploración de algunas propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de satisfacción vital, felicidad subjetiva y auto-percepción de salud. En E. Moyano Díaz (Ed.), Calidad de vida y Psicología en el Bicentenario de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Mármor.

Moyano-Díaz, E. (2011, Noviembre). Creencias sobre el medio ambiente en relación a la felicidad, el pensamiento liberal y la ideología. Presentación en Simposio VI Congreso Chileno de Psicología, Santiago, Chile.

Navarro, V. Globalización económica, poder político y Estado del bienestar. Editorial Ariel España. ISBN: 978-84-344-1438-9.

Negrón, E., Arias, W., & Delbrey, A. (2002). Conocimientos y actitudes sobre salud ambiental de los estudiantes de programas graduados en salud pública. XXVIII Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ambiental, Cancún, México, 27-31 Octubre.

Noony, J., Woodrum, E., Hoban, T., & Clifford, W. (2003). Environmental worldview and behavior: Consequences of dimensionality in a survey of North Carolinians. Environment & Behavior, 33, 181-208.

Obregón, F. y Zaragoza, F.(2000). La relación de la tradición y modernidad con las creencias ambientales. Revista Sonorense de Psicología, 14(1), 63-71

Obregón, F. & Corral-Verdugo, V. (1995). Systems of beliefs and environmental conservation behavior in a Mexican community. Environment and behavior 29 (2), 213-235.

Olli, E., Grendstad, G., &Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviors-Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior, 33, 181-208.

Pato, C. & Tamayo, A. (2006). Valores, creencias ambientales y comportamiento ecológico de activismo. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano,7, 51-66.

Peterson, M. N. &Liu, J. (2008). Impacts of religion on environmental worldviews: The Teton Valley case. Society & Natural Resources, 21, 704-718.

Préndez, M. &Ulriksen, P. (1993). La contaminación del aire y sus efectos. En H. Sandoval, M. Préndez y P. Ulriksen (Eds.). Contaminación atmosférica de Santiago: Estado actual y soluciones. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universidad de Chile.

Rubio, C., Gutiérrez, A. J., Martín-Izquierdo, R. E., Revert, C., Lozano, G., &Hardisson, A. (2004). El plomo como contaminante alimentario. Revista de toxicología, 21, 72-80.

Stern, P. & Oskam, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. En D. Stokols y L. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 1043-1088). NY: Wiley.

Taskin, O. (2009). The environmental attitudes of Turkish senior high school students in the context of post materialism and the New Environmental Paradigm. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 481-502.

Triandis, C. (2000). Dialectics between cultural and cross-cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 185-195.

Torgler, B. & García Valiñas, M.A. (2005). The determinants of individual’s attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Sustainability indicators and Environmental Valuation (FEEM, n° 110.05)

Vargas, M. F. (2005). La contaminación ambiental como factor determinante de la salud. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 79, 117-127.

Vicente, M. y Aldamiz-Echeverría, C. (2003). Aproximación al perfil sociodemográfico del consumidor ecológico a través de la evidencia empiríca. Boletín Económico. ICE, 25-40.

Vlek, C. &Steg, L. (2007). Human behavior and environmental sustainability, driving forces, and research tapes. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 1-19.

Weigel, R. &Weigel, J. (1978). Environmental concern.The development of a measure. Environmentand Behavior, 10, 3-15.

Yang, K. (2000). Monocultural and intercultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 241-263.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Reference by

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |