How to Cite
Restrepo L, X., & Villada Zapata, J. . (2021). Can belief- reading training influence pragmatic competence? A study on the relationships of these cognitive abilities in childhood. Acta Colombiana De Psicología, 24(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.2.8
License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

 Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).

 Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.

Abstract

In order to investigate the influence of belief-reading on pragmatic competence, 56 children between 48 and 54 months old, belonging to the program Buen Comienzo [Good Start] in the city of Medellín, participated in a pre-post experimental design with a control group. For the evaluation of belief-reading, four tests of the Wellman and Liu (2004) Scale were adapted to Spanish; while for the evaluation of pragmatic competence, four communicative situations proposed by Sacco et., al. (2008) were adapted. For the manipulation of the variable, 10 training sessions in belief-reading were carried out. According to the intragroup results, the training program was effective in improving the trained variable, as the experimental group improved its performance in belief reading (p=,007; d= -,663) and pragmatic competence (p=,007; d=,648). However, although significant differences were found between the experimental group and the control group for belief reading (p=,001; d=,472), this was not the case for performance in pragmatic competence (p=,340; d=,143). In light of these results, it is not possible to ensure a relationship of influence of belief reading on pragmatic competence. Nevertheless, a satisfactory linear regression model was found when sociodemographic variables were included in the analyzes. The need to integrate context variables when inquiring about a possible relationship of influence of one psychological variable on another is discussed.

Keywords:

References

Ato, M., López, J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059, http://dx.doi. org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Baixauli-Fortea, I., Casas, M., Berenguer-Forner, A. Colomer- Diago, C., & Roselló-Miranda, B. (2017). Pragmatic competence of children with autism spectrum disorder. Impact of theory of mind, verbal working memory, ADHD symp¬toms, and structural language. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 8(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.20 17.1392861

Belinchón, M., Igoa, J., & Rivière, A. (2004). Psicología del lenguaje. Investigación y teoría (6. ª ed.). Trotta S. A.

Bermúdez, M. (2009). Teorías infantiles de la mente y lenguaje: ¿un problema de huevo o gallina? Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 2(1), 67-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.33881/2027- 1786.rip.2209

Bosco, F. M., & Gabbatore, I. (2017). Sincere, Deceitful, and Ironic Communicative Acts and the Role of the Theory of Mind in Childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(21). https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00021

Bosco, F. M., Parola, A., Sacco, K., Zettin, M., & Angeleri, R. (2017). Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of theory of mind and executive functions. Brain and Language, 168, 73-83. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007

Bosco, F. M., Tirassa, M., & Gabbatore, I. (2018). Why pragmatics and Theory of Mind do not (Completely) overlap. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.01453

Cerpa, L., & Yepes, E. (2020). Relación entre Lectura de creen¬cias y Competencia Pragmática y su evolución luego de un entrenamiento en Lectura de creencias [Tesis de pregrado no publicada]. Universidad de Antioquia.

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística [DANE]. (15 de abril de 2021). Estratificación socioeconómica. https:// www.dane.gov.co/index.php/servicios-al-ciudadano/116- espanol/informacion-georreferenciada/2421-estratificación-socioeconomica-preguntas-frecuentes#:~:text=La%20 ESTRATIFICACI%C3%93N%20SOCIOECON%C3%93 MICA%20es%20la,(Ley%20142%20de%201994)

Deleau, M. (2012). Language and theory of mind: Why pragmatics matter. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/174056 29.2012.680303

Dunn, J., Brown, J., & Beardsall, L. (1991). Family talk about feeling states and children’s later understanding of others’ emotions. Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 448-455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.448

Fujino, H., Fukushima, K., & Fujiyoshi, A. (2017). Theory of mind and language development in Japanese children with hearing loss. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 96, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.03.005

Gutiérrez-Ordóñez, S. (22-25 de septiembre de 2005). Ejercitarás la competencia pragmática. XVI Congreso Internacional de la ASELE: la Competencia Pragmática o la Enseñanza del Español como Lengua Extranjera. Oviedo. https://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/asele/pdf/16/16_0025.pdf

Hale, C. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study. Developmental Science, 6(3), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00289

Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.70

Jones, A. C., Gutierrez, R., & Ludlow, A. K. (2015). Confronting the language barrier: Theory of mind in deaf children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 56, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.06.005

Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Demicheli, P., & Cavallini, E. (2014). Training Preschoolers on First-Order False Belief Understanding: Transfer on Advanced TdM Skills and Metamemory. Child Development, 85(6), 2404-2418. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12267

Lecce, S., Ronchi, L., Del Sette, P., Bischetti, L., & Bambini, V. (2018). Interpreting physical and mental metaphors: Is Theory of Mind associated with pragmatics in middle childhood? Journal of Child Language, 46(2), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030500091800048x

Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The Role of Language in the Development of False Belief Understanding: A Training Study. Child Development, 74(4), 1130-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00597

McMahon, C., & Bernier, A. (2017). Twenty years of research on parental mind-mindedness: Empirical findings, theoretical and methodological challenges, and new directions. Developmental Review, 46, 54-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.07.001

Mendoza-Lara, E., & López-Herrero, P. (2004). Consideraciones sobre el desarrollo de la teoría de la mente (TdM) y el lenguaje. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 57(1), 49-67. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/856428.pdf

Milligan, K., Astington, J., & Dack, L. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Language Ability and False-belief Understanding. Child Development, 78(2), 622-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x

Muhinyi, A., & Rowe, M. (2019). Shared reading with pre¬verbal infants and later language development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 64, 101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101053

Parola, A., Berardinelli, L., & Bosco, F. M. (2018). Cognitive abilities and theory of mind in explaining communica¬tive-pragmatic disorders in patients with schizophre¬nia. Psychiatry Research, 260, 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.051

Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekman, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from four sibs. Child Development, 65(4), 1228-1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00814.x

Peterson, C. C. (2000). Kindred spirits: Influences of si¬blings’ perspectives on theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00040

Poulin-Dubois, D. (2020). Theory of mind development: state of the science and future directions. Progress in Brain Research, 254, 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.021

Prime, H., Plamondon, A., Pauker, S., Perlman, M., & Jenkins, J. M. (2016). Sibling cognitive sensitivity as a moderator of the relationship between sibship size and children’s theory of mind: a longitudinal analysis. Cognitive Development, 39(July-September), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.03.005

Restrepo, X. (2020). Relaciones entre la competencia pragmá¬tica y la lectura de creencias: efectos de dos programas de entrenamiento en niños de 4 años [Tesis de maestría no publicada]. Universidad de Antioquia.

Ruffman, T., Slade, L., & Crowe, E. (2002). The Relation bet¬ween Children’s and Mothers Mental State Language and Theory-of-Mind Understanding. Child Development, 73(3), 734-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00435

Ruffman, T., Perner, J., & Parkin, L. (1998). Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 161-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.161

Ruffman, T., Perner, J., & Parkin, L. (1999). How parenting style affects false belief understanding. Social Development, 8(3), 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00103

Ruffman, T., Puri, A., Galloway, O., Su, J., & Taumoepeau, M. (2018). Variety in parental use of “want” relates to subsequent growth in children’s theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 54(4), 677-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000459

Russell, T. A., Tchanturia, K., Rahman, Q., & Schmidt, U. (2007). Sex differences in theory of mind: A male advanta¬ge on Happé’s “cartoon” task. Cognition y Emotion, 21(7), 1554-1564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930601117096

Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Bosco, F., Colle L., Mate, D., & Bara, B. (2008). Assessment Battery for Communication-ABaCo: A new instrument for the evaluation of pragmatic abilities. Journal of Cognitive Science, 9(2), 111-157. https://pdfs. semanticscholar.org/4c40/ee5e22f35b95b3d71e35c79db¬36f4cbe65a6.pdf

Sante, M., Sylvestre, A., Bouchard, C., & Leblond, J. (2020). Parental behaviors associated with the level of pragma¬tic language ability among 42-month-old neglected chil¬dren. Child Abuse & Neglect, 104, 104482. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104482

Serrano, J. (2013). Desarrollo de la teoría de la mente, len¬guaje y funciones ejecutivas en niños de 4 a 12 años [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Girona, España. http://hdl.handle. net/10803/123549

Shin, S., Leech, K., & Rowe, M. (2020). Examining relations between parent-child narrative talk and children’s episodic foresight and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 55, 100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100910

Song, J., & Volling, B. (2018). Theory-of-Mind Development and Early Sibling Relationships after the Birth of a Sibling: Parental Discipline Matters. Infant & Child Development, 27(1), e2053. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2053

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2012). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Meaning and Relevance, 17, 261-278. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.016

Vigotsky, L. (1931/2012). El problema del desarrollo de las fun¬ciones psíquicas superiores. En Obras escogidas (Tomo 3). Machado Nuevo Aprendizaje.

Wacker, R., Bölte, S., & Dziobek, I. (2017). Women Know Better What Other Women Think and Feel: Gender Effects on Mindreading across the Adult Life Span. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1324. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.01324

Weimer, A., Rice, K., Ettekal, I., Cartwright, K., Guajardo, N., & Liew, J. (2021). Correlates and antecedents of theory of mind development during middle childhood and adolescen¬ce: An integrated model. Developmental Review, 59, Article 100945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100945

Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford University Press.

Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523-541. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x

Westra, E. (2017). Pragmatic Development and the False Belief Task. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 8(2), 235-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-016-0320-5

Westra, E., & Carruthers, P. (2017). Pragmatic development ex¬plains the Theory-of-Mind Scale. Cognition, 158, 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.021

Woensdregt, M., & Smith, K. (2016). Pragmatics and Language Evolution. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.321

Zeegers, M., Colonnesi, C., Stam, G., & Meins, E. (2017). Mind matters: A three-level meta-analysis on parental mentalization and sensitivity as predictors of infant-Parent attachment. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), 1245-1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000114

Reference by

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |