pdf (Español (España))
FLIP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).
Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.
Abstract
This study aimed to conduct the cultural adaptation and analysis of the factorial structure and reliability of the reduced version of the organizational climate test FOCUS-93 in a sample of Colombian employees. The test was administered to 569 participants, with a mean age of 33.98 years (SD = 11.14, range: 18–68 years), including 240 men (42.40%) and 326 women (57.60%), with three missing data points (0.53%), and an average reported job tenure of 5.15 years (SD = 6.04). The cultural adaptation was carried out through expert evaluation, and validation was performed using factor analysis. The findings indicate that the questionnaire should be expanded to 14 items and support the original model composed of four dimensions (support, innovation, orientation, and rules), as these showed the best factorial fit indices (CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.04) compared to other proposed models. In addition, adequate indicators of structural fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.04) were observed in both unidimensional and orthogonal structures, as well as in a second-order model. The test also showed favorable values in terms of internal consistency, supporting its reliability in both the total assessment and in its subscales. Finally, theoretical aspects related to the measurement of organizational climate and its dimensions were analyzed in order to provide a comprehensive view of the instrument’s validity and robustness.
References
Alvis, N. J. (2022, abril 22). Sala de prensa: Quiénes somos los servidores públicos. Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. https://www1.funcionpublica.gov.co/-/quienes-somos-los-servidores-publicos
Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(1), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511. 2014.859510
Cardona-Echeverri, D. R., & Zambrano-Cruz, R. (2014). Revisión de instrumentos de evaluación de clima organizacional. Estudios Gerenciales. Journal of Management and Economics for Iberoamerica, 30(131), 184-189. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.04.007
Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos. (2016). Acuerdo N.°15. Manual deontológico y bioético del psicólogo. (4.ª versión). https://www.colpsic.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Acuerdo-No.-15-ano-2018-1.pdf
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística [DANE]. (2022, agosto 2). Comunicado de prensa. Perspectivas del mercado laboral desde el Registro estadístico de relaciones laborales -RELAB y Directorios Estadísticos. https:// www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/ech/ech/CP_RELAB_empleo_may_22.pdf
Díaz-Fúnez, P. A., Mañas-Rodríguez, M. A., Pecino-Medina, V., Salvador-Ferrer, C. M., & Llopis-Marín, J. M. (2016). El efecto modulador del clima organizacional en la influencia de la comunicación de funciones directivas sobre el conflicto de rol. Universitas Psychologica, 15(1), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-1.emco
González-Romá, V., Tomás, I., Peiró, J., Lloret, S., Espejo, B., Ferreres, A., & Hernández, A. (1996). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario de clima organizacional FOCUS-93. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 6(1), 5-22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258538897_Analisis_de_las_propiedades_psicometricas_del_cuestionario_de_clima_organizacional_FOCUS-93
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Gupta, V., & GLOBE associates (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
IBM Corporation. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26.0) [Software]. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ downloading-ibm-spss-statistics-26
JASP Team. (2023). JASP (Version 0.18) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/
Khamkong, M. (2012). Approximate Confidence Interval for the Mean of Poisson Distribution. Open Journal of Statistics, 2(2), 204-207. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2012.22024
Ley 1581 de 2012. Por la cual se dictan disposiciones generales para la protección de datos personales. Diario Oficial No. 48.587 del 17 de octubre de 2012.
Congreso de la República de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov. co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=49981
Mañas, M. A., González -Roma, V., & Peiró, J. M. (1999). El clima de los equipos de trabajo: determinantes y consecuencias. Instituto de Estudios Almerienses y Universidad de Almería.
Markon, K. E. (2019). Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522
Méndez, C., & Rondón, M. A. (2012). Introducción al análisis factorial exploratorio, Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 41(1),197-207. http://scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74502012000100014
Merino, C., & Segovia, L. (2009). Intervalos de confianza asimétricos para el índice de validez de contenido: Un programa Visual Basic para la V de Aiken. Anales de psicología, 25(1), 196- 171. https://www.um.es/analesps/ v25/v25_1/19-25_1.pdf
Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2002). Clasificación y descripción de las metodologías de investigación en psicología. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2(3), 503-508. https://www.aepc.es/ijchp/articulos_pdf/ ijchp-53.pdf
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
Resolución 8430 de 1993. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Diario Oficial No. 41.517 del 4 de octubre de 1993. Ministerio de Salud. https://www.minsalud.gov. co/sites/rid/lists/bibliotecadigital/ride/de/dij/resolucion-8430-de-1993.pdf
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361-388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga,Y. H. (2014). Multilevel analysis of individuals and culture (2.a ed.). Psychology Press.
Van Muijen, J. J., Koopman, P., De Witte, K., Susanj, Z., Branyicski, I., Pitariu, H., Peiró, J. M., González-Romá, V., & Turnipseed, D. (1999). Organizational Culture: The Focus Questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 551-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135943299398168
Willson, S., & Miller, K. (2014). Data collection. En K. Miller, V. Chepp, S. Willson & J. L. Padilla (Eds.), Cognitive Interviewing Methodology: A Sociological Approach for Survey Question Evaluation. John Wiley and Sons.
