This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Acta Colombiana de Psicología complies with international intellectual property and copyright laws, and particularly with Article No. 58 of the Political Constitution of Colombia, Law No. 23 of 1982, and the Agreement No. 172 of September 30, 2010 (Universidad Católica de Colombia Intellectual Property Regulation).
Authors retain their copyright and grant to the Acta Colombiana de Psicología the right of first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material, provided they credit the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.
Abstract
Four conditions of spatial contiguity of positions were used to assess sequence learning. Two sequences of 16 and 25 positions presented in two matrices of 4×4 and 5×5 respectively were used. Within each matrix, 4 (in the 4×4 matrix) or 6 positions (in the 5×5 matrix) presented spatial contiguity. The place at the sequence in which contiguous positions occurred varied across groups. In this way, spatial contiguity of the 4 or 6 positions was presented at the beginning of the sequence (Group 1), in the middle part (Group 2), at the end of the sequence (Group 3) or it was presented a sequence in which all
positions occurred without spatial contiguity (Group 4). 28 undergraduate students participated. Results showed no differences among groups in the number of trials required to reproduce the sequence correctly. Number of errors was lower when contiguous positions were presented at the beginning of the sequence. These findings are explained as a possible effect of accentuation of primacy given by the occurrence of contiguous positions at the beginning of the sequence.
Keywords:
References
American Psychological Association [APA]. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https:// www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Beran, M. J., Pate, J. L., Washburn, D. A., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (2004). Sequential responding and planning in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 30(3), 203–212. https://doi. org/10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.203
Botvinick, M. M., Wang, J., Cowan, E., Roy, S., Bastianen, C., Patrick Mayo, J., & Houk, J. C. (2009). An analysis of immediate serial recall performance in a macaque. Animal Cognition, 12(5), 671–678. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10071-009-0226-z
Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107(1), 127–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.107.1.127
Castro, L. (1990). Diseño experimental sin estadística: usos y restricciones en su aplicación a las ciencias de la conducta. Trillas.
Clegg, B. A., Digirolamo, G. J., & Keele, S. W. (1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)0120 2-9
DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(4), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0034024
Ebenholtz, S. (1963). Serial learning: Position learning and sequential associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(4), 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0048320
Farrand, P., Parmentier, F. B., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Temporal-spatial memory: retrieval of spatial information does not reduce recency. Acta Psychologica, 106(3), 285– 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00054-8
Friedman, W. J. (1993). Memory for the time of past events. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 44–66. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.44
Healey, M. K., Long, N. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2019). Contiguity in episodic memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1537-3
Henson R. N. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 73– 137. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0685
Hintzman, D. L. (2016). Is memory organized by temporal contiguity? Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 365–375 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0573-8
Hurlstone, M. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2015). How is the serial order of a spatial sequence represented? Insights from transposition latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 295-324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038223
Hursltone, M., Hitch, G., & Baddley, A. (2014). Memory of serial order across domains: an overview of the literature and directions of future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339-373. https://doi:10.1037/a0034221
Inoue, S., & Matsuzawa, T. (2009). Acquisition and memory of sequence order in young and adult chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal cognition, 12 Suppl 1, S59–S69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0274-4
Jones, D., Farrand, P., Stuart, G., & Morris, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 1008–1018. https://doi. org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.1008
Kao, T., Jensen, G., Michaelcheck, C., Ferrera, V. P., & Terrace, H. S. (2020). Absolute and relative knowledge of ordinal position on implied lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2227–2243. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000783
Kausler, D. (1966). Readings in Verbal Learning Contemporary theory and Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Leite, G. d. L., Alves, M. V., Ekuni, R., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2018). Effect of intermediate repeated items on immediate recall in a modified Hebb paradigm. Psychology & Neuroscience, 11(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000113
Lewandowsky, S., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 96(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.25
Lindsey, D. (2019). Item-to-Item Associations Contribute to Memory for Serial Order [Doctoral thesis, Vanderbilt University]. Vanderbilt University Institutional Repository: https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-062620 19-140640
Lindsey, D. R. B., & Logan, G. D. (2021). Previously retrieved items contribute to memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(9), 1403–1438. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001052
Logan, G. D. (2021). Serial order in perception, memory, and action. Psychological Review, 128(1), 1-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000253
Majerus, S., & Oberauer, K. (2020). Working memory and serial order: Evidence against numerical order codes but for item-position associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2244–2260. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000792
Myers, J. L. (1979). Fundamentals of Experimental Design. Third edition. Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Miller G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
McClearn, G. E., & Harlow, H. F. (1954). The effect of spatial contiguity on discrimination learning by rhesus monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(5), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059728
Nairne, J. S. (2015). The Three “Ws” of Episodic Memory: What, When, and Where. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0267
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
Pathman, T., & Ghetti S. (2015). Eye movements provide an index of vertical memory for temporal order. Plos One, 10(5), Article e0125648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0125648
Pathman, T., & Ghetti, S. (2016). More to it than meets the eye: how eye movements can elucidate the development of episodic memory. Memory (Hove, England), 24(6), 721- 736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1155870
Solway, A., Murdock, B., & Kahana, M. (2012). Positional and temporal clustering in serial order memory. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 177- 190. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0142-8
Scarf, D., Danly, E., Morgan, G., Colombo, M., & Terrace, H. S. (2011). Sequential planning in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 14(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0365-2
Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1589–1625. https://doi. org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1589
Tamayo Tamayo, J. E. (2019). Aprendizaje serial de secuencias basadas en la posición y dimensión de sus componentes. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 12(3), 9-20. https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/1683
Young, R. (1962). Test of three hypotheses about the effective stimulus in serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0038534
Young, R., Patterson, J., & Benson, W. (1963). Backward serial learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1(5), 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80013-4
Zhang, H., Zhen, Y., Yu, S., Long, T., Zhang, B., Jiang, X., Li, J., Fang, W., Sigman, M., Dehaene, S., & Wang, L. (2022). Working Memory for Spatial Sequences: Developmental and Evolutionary Factors in Encoding Ordinal and Relational Structures. The Journal of Neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 42(5), 850–864. https://doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.0603-21.2021